YOUR ONE-STOP SHOP FOR ALL THINGS NEURODIVERSITY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION
YOUR ONE-STOP SHOP FOR ALL THINGS NEURODIVERSITY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION
1. Will my firm help me get an assessment for neurodivergence?
2. Should I disclose my neurodivergence?
3. How can I ask for adjustments?
4. Using Access to Work
5. I want to encourage my employer to do more in the neurodiversity space, how can I do this?
6. I'm starting a new job, what could help me?
7. I'm having problems at work, but I don't want to raise a legal dispute, what can I do?
8. Navigating the traditional training contract - explore a range of topics and advice
9. I'm a legal professional and I'm struggling with...
a. confidence
b. organisation
c. communication and networking
d. processing
This section is all about the messy, complicated, often unspoken side of navigating work as a neurodivergent person in the legal profession. It shares tips, reflections and real-life strategies on how to advocate for yourself in environments that might not have been built with you in mind.
You will find ideas on managing conversations, setting boundaries, asking for adjustments and handling the emotional weight that often comes with being different in a professional setting. These aren’t rules or prescriptions. They are tools and insights, shaped by lived experience, that you can take or leave depending on what fits your situation.
The aim is to make you feel less alone, not to tell you what to do.
This section does not contain legal advice. It is not intended to be used as a guide in any employment dispute or legal claim. The content reflects personal experiences and general tips, not legal guidance.
If you are facing a specific workplace issue or need support with a dispute, please speak to a qualified employment solicitor or legal adviser. A separate section of this website covers general information about your legal rights at work.
The tips and insights shared in this section come from a mix of sources. Much of it is based on the lived experiences of our members, as well as the professional experiences of neurodivergent people working in or alongside the legal profession.
We also draw on what we’ve learned through our wider work with law firms, businesses and individuals navigating these systems in real time. While it’s not legal advice, it’s grounded in real interactions, common patterns and practical approaches that have helped people advocate for themselves in a profession that doesn’t always make it easy.
Yes! We welcome submissions and you will be credited. Please email us outreach@ndlawyerproject.org.uk with a proposed topic/title and we will approve or discuss how we can incorporate your topic. Please ensure submissions are no longer than 500 words and do not overly favour one particular viewpoint. We reserve the right to amend your submission, if deemed necessary.
Some law firms do support employees in accessing a diagnostic assessment for neurodivergence, but this is not standard across the profession. Where support is available, it usually comes through one of the following routes:
Some firms offer private health insurance as part of your benefits package. In a few cases, this can be used to cover or contribute to the cost of an autism or ADHD assessment. What is included will depend on the provider and the specific policy your firm has chosen. Some providers only fund assessments if they are linked to mental health difficulties or another specific referral route.
If your firm offers private healthcare, you can check the policy documents or ask HR for a copy of the mental health coverage details. If you are not comfortable disclosing why you are asking, you can frame it as a general question about what is included.
Some firms will refer employees to occupational health services if you disclose difficulties that are impacting your work. An occupational health report will not diagnose you, but it may suggest that you seek a full assessment and can recommend adjustments in the meantime. In some cases, this referral process can be a stepping stone to securing funding or support for a diagnosis later.
In some firms, the disability or neurodiversity staff network, HR team, or mental health first aiders may help you explore the possibility of getting assessed. While they usually will not organise the assessment directly, they may help you find information, advocate on your behalf, or flag up support routes you were not aware of.
Some firms have publicly shared that they have supported individuals in accessing diagnostic assessments, often through private healthcare or case-by-case support. These include:
Please note that this support is not guaranteed for every employee, and it is often based on individual circumstances. The firm may also have limits on what they can fund or how they handle referrals.
If your firm does not offer direct access to an assessment, you still have options:
There is no single right answer to this. Whether or not to disclose is a personal decision that depends on your circumstances, role, and workplace culture.
You may wish to read other neurodivergent lawyers’ experiences in the Submissions tab. However, it’s important to remember that these are individual stories shaped by many different factors, and what worked for someone else may not necessarily work for you.
Other sources of help:
1. Employee resource groups (ERGs) or staff networks
If your workplace has a disability or neurodiversity network, you may be able to speak to others confidentially. Some offer peer support, buddy systems, or informal advice on how disclosure is received internally.
2. Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)
The EHRC publishes clear guidance on your rights under the Equality Act 2010, including the duty to make reasonable adjustments and protections from discrimination.
www.equalityhumanrights.com
3. ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service)
ACAS offers practical and accessible information on your rights at work. It includes guidance on disability, workplace adjustments, and how to raise concerns if needed.
www.acas.org.uk
4. Employment tribunal decisions or case law
For those in the legal profession, reviewing anonymised tribunal decisions (for example through GOV.UK or BAILII) may offer insight into how the law has been interpreted in real-life workplace scenarios involving disclosure or adjustments.
5. Occupational health referrals
Some employers offer occupational health services. These are usually confidential and may help identify adjustments without needing to share full details directly with your manager or team.
6. Charities and advocacy organisations
Organisations such as Neurodiversity in Law, Neurodiversity Celebration Week, the National Autistic Society, ADHD UK, and Disability Rights UK often provide resources, toolkits and guidance on disclosure and workplace inclusion.
7. Diagnostic professionals
If you are in the process of being diagnosed or already have a diagnosis, you may be able to ask your clinician for advice on what workplace support might help. This can also help clarify whether your condition is likely to meet the legal definition of disability.
8. Legal advice
If you are experiencing problems at work, it may be helpful to seek independent legal advice from a solicitor or advice centre specialising in employment or discrimination law.
Unfortunately, disclosing your neurodivergence can come with risks. These may include:
Research supports this. A 2022 report by Birkbeck and GatenbySanderson found that neurodivergent professionals often face significant barriers to progression, largely due to misunderstanding, stigma, and limited workplace support. But this can depend upon your firm and team.
While you are not strictly required to disclose your neurodivergence to receive reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 (please take legal advice before relying on this), disclosure often makes the process much more straightforward.
Things to consider:
Our members have shared examples of both good and bad experiences. Some found that adjustments transformed their working life. Others found that adjustments were misunderstood as “hand-holding” or “unfair advantages”, which negatively impacted how they were treated by colleagues or managers. In some cases, disclosing before an interview and requesting adjustments has led to interview offers being withdrawn or communication being cut off.
When adjustments are implemented correctly, they can be a vital tool. For example, if you process information differently, transcription software might help with meetings or note-taking. If focus is a challenge, small environmental or scheduling changes can help you thrive.
Some people choose to disclose because their traits are misinterpreted without context. For example:
This can result in unfair labels such as being “difficult” or “not a team player”, which can affect both workplace relationships and promotion prospects. In some workplaces, disclosure can reframe this narrative in a more accurate and constructive way. In others, difference is accepted without explanation.
Many people, however, choose not to disclose and that is completely valid too. You might view your diagnosis as private. You might be concerned about how others will respond. Several of our members have said that after disclosing ADHD or ADD, colleagues began to treat them as lazy or chaotic, regardless of their actual performance.
Others disclose from a sense of pride or a desire to be open. Some want to challenge stigma by being visible. Others feel empowered by embracing their neurodivergence, or want to show that it’s possible to succeed in law without hiding who you are. That said, disclosure is not the only way to do any of these things.
Some law firms have formal processes or policies for disclosure and adjustments. This can be reassuring and show that the firm is thinking ahead, but for some, the process can feel overly formal or uncomfortable, especially if it involves unfamiliar HR staff.
In these cases, it can be helpful to:
If no policy exists, this can understandably make disclosure feel more daunting. We’ve included suggestions on navigating informal disclosure elsewhere on the page.
Your personal view of your neurodivergence will naturally shape how you feel about disclosure and support.
Some people feel that asking for reasonable adjustments takes away from the sense that they have achieved everything on their own. They may prefer not to draw attention to themselves, or feel more comfortable managing things independently. For some, this can also stem from a desire to avoid being seen as different or less capable. These are completely valid feelings, and no one is ever required to disclose.
At the same time, it is worth noting that some of these views may be shaped by past experiences or wider messaging. For example:
Some people prefer to implement their own strategies. For instance, someone with ADHD might use timers, calendars or productivity tools and find these work well for them without needing formal adjustments. If this approach is manageable and works for you, that’s a perfectly valid choice too.
It’s a deeply personal decision. What feels right for one person may not feel right for another.
Lastly, while you do not need to always disclose your neurodivergence to be protected under the Equality Act 2010, in practice, disclosure often makes it easier to access adjustments and assert your rights. It helps create a clear record that your employer was aware, which can be important if problems arise later.
Asking for adjustments can feel daunting, especially when you’re new to the role or unsure how things work behind the scenes. But most law firms do have systems in place, even if they’re not particularly easy to find or understand.
Here’s a step-by-step guide based on what law firms tend to do in practice:
Some firms have an internal adjustments policy, though it’s usually buried in the HR or people team section of the intranet. Others may not have anything written down but still follow an informal process.
You can look for key words like:
If you can’t find anything, it’s completely fine to ask. You could say:
“Is there a process for requesting workplace adjustments or getting support for health or neurodivergence-related needs?”
If you don’t feel comfortable asking HR straight away, you could speak to your supervisor or someone in a staff network who may know how the process works.
In many firms, once you flag a need for adjustments, you’ll be referred to occupational health. This is fairly standard and is not about assessing whether you’re “disabled enough”, it’s a way of getting an independent report on what adjustments might help.
Here’s how it usually works:
This report goes to HR or the relevant people team, who usually discuss it with you and your manager before implementing anything.
It can feel clinical or uncomfortable, and the level of understanding and knowledge can differ depending upon which external organisation is used.
Try to reflect on what tasks or situations make your role harder, and what has helped in the past. This could include:
“I’ve been finding some parts of the role difficult but I’m still working out exactly what would help. Would it be possible to speak to someone or go through the adjustments process to explore options?”
It helps to follow up in writing, especially after a chat with your supervisor or HR. This doesn’t need to be formal or legal, something short and practical is enough:
“Thanks for the chat earlier. Just to confirm, I’d like to explore some adjustments to support me at work. Happy to go through any formal process or referral if needed.”
If it goes to occupational health, you can also ask to see the report before it’s sent to your manager or HR.
Adjustments are meant to evolve with your needs. If something isn’t working, or things change over time, you’re allowed to go back and revisit the process. That might mean updating an occupational health report, having a review meeting or suggesting a new adjustment.
This is normal, especially in law, where different teams or deadlines can impact how accessible things feel.
It’s okay to say, “I’m not sure what I need but I know I’m struggling.” You don’t have to figure it all out on your own. A good HR team or manager will work with you to explore what’s possible.
Access to Work is a government scheme that helps fund extra support to make your job more accessible. It’s for disabled people, including many neurodivergent people, and can be a lifeline, especially in workplaces that aren’t always set up with you in mind.
You can apply whether you’re employed, self-employed, part-time, in a training contract or even working remotely. You don’t need a formal diagnosis, but you do need to explain how your neurodivergence or health needs affect you at work.
Access to Work can pay for:
It’s not there to replace your firm’s legal duties, it’s meant to add extra support on top, especially when your needs go beyond what your employer is used to providing.
This is the part that gets messy.
In theory:
In practice, especially in law firms:
You might be asked to research equipment suppliers, find coaches, collect quotes, and manage the back-and-forth with HR and Access to Work. This can feel like another job on top of your actual job.
That means your employer pays upfront, then claims it back. Some firms are supportive. Others delay, or expect you to pay and wait for reimbursement. This isn’t realistic for many people.
It’s common to wait several months to get the assessment, and even longer for funding decisions. If you’re already struggling, that delay can make things worse.
For example, you might be approved for coaching, but only at a capped rate. If your preferred coach charges more, you or your employer may have to cover the difference.
Some law firms are familiar with Access to Work and will help you apply or cover costs up front. Others haven’t heard of it, or might treat it like a hassle. You might need to explain how it works and why it’s separate from internal adjustments.
You don’t have to figure it all out alone.
It can be frustrating when your firm talks about diversity in vague terms, but never mentions neurodiversity. Maybe there is no visible support. Maybe you are tired of seeing neurodivergence only mentioned once a year during Autism Awareness Week. Or maybe you just want to feel a bit less alone.
Here are some practical ways to encourage your employer to take neurodiversity seriously, without putting all the pressure on you.
You do not need to suggest a full strategy. One concrete idea is enough. For example:
If your firm already has networks or a diversity committee, they might be open to hearing more. Even sharing a podcast, article or ND Lawyer Project resource (shameless plug!) can spark a conversation.
Progress is often slow because it is not clear who is responsible. You could check the intranet or ask around to find out:
You do not need to have everything figured out before speaking to someone. Just letting them know that staff are interested in this area can be helpful.
If you feel safe, try to find others who care about this too. Maybe someone else has asked for adjustments or mentioned support needs in passing. You do not have to build a network on your own. Sometimes it just starts with a few people having a chat or attending a meeting together.
You could also join events run by external neurodivergent-led organisations. Bringing that learning back to your firm can show what is possible.
Some employers only take action when there is a clear business case. That can feel frustrating, but if you think it might help, you could say:
You are not reducing anyone to productivity. You are just using the tools available to make change more likely.
Some firms genuinely do not know what good looks like. Sharing trusted resources can make things feel more achievable. These might include:
You could also ask if your firm would consider signing up to an initiative or becoming a partner with an existing group.
You are not responsible for overhauling your firm’s entire culture. If you are burning out, feeling unsafe, or just do not have the capacity, that is completely valid. You do not have to disclose, lead a network or share personal stories to make change.
Sometimes the smallest actions, a shared article, a quiet suggestion, a one-line question in a meeting, are the ones that make space for someone else to speak up too.
Starting a new job can be overwhelming, especially if you’re neurodivergent. You might be dealing with unspoken expectations, information overload or sensory challenges on top of the usual nerves. These tips are designed to help you settle in, ask for support and protect your energy from day one.
If possible, try to speak to someone trained in adjustments before you start or during your first few days. This might be through HR, a people manager or occupational health. It helps to have support in place before things become difficult. You can also ask for a review meeting later once you’ve had time to settle in and notice what works or doesn’t.
If you’re working in person, ask if someone can show you around the office properly and help with introductions. Being walked around by someone, rather than sent off alone, can reduce anxiety and help you remember who people are and what they do.
This helps if you need time to process things or want to review information later. It can also reduce pressure to take everything in at once, especially if you’re tired or distracted. If something is visual or fast-paced, having it in a written format can make it easier to engage with.
You can ask for a phased start where your workload builds up over time. This might mean fewer hours of chargeable work or a lighter caseload while you get used to new systems and expectations. You could say something like, “It would really help me to ease in gradually while I learn how everything works.”
Ask if there’s a preferred way to raise questions. Some teams have a clear structure, others are more informal. You can say, “I tend to ask a lot of clarification questions when I’m learning. Is it better to ask as I go or keep a list for check-ins?” This can help you avoid feeling like you’re being disruptive.
If your firm offers neurodiversity coaching or you can access it through something like Access to Work, it can be a really useful adjustment. Coaching can help you manage your wellbeing, build routines and develop ways of working that suit your brain. It’s especially helpful if you’re not used to corporate settings or find office culture confusing.
If the office is open plan, loud or bright, see if you can speak to facilities or IT about alternatives. You might be able to reserve a quieter desk, wear noise-reducing headphones or use a separate space when needed. Some firms are happy to accommodate this but may not offer unless you ask.
Keep a log of what you’re told, what’s expected of you and who does what. This doesn’t have to be neat. It could be a list on your phone, a notebook or a document you update as you go. Having this kind of external memory can reduce anxiety and help when your brain is full.
You might feel pressure to say yes to everything or go to every social event. But starting a new job is already a big shift. Try not to overcommit just to seem keen. However, we recognise that this is often not the expectations of firms. it can be a balancing exercise.
10. Work out who to disclose to (if anyone)
You don’t have to tell everyone you’re neurodivergent. But it can help to decide who you feel safe opening up to. That might be HR, a supervisor or a mentor. Disclosure doesn’t have to be all or nothing, you can choose what to share and when.
11. Look for support and mentorship
See if your firm has staff networks, buddy schemes or mentoring programmes. Even having one person you can check in with makes a huge difference. If there isn’t anything internal, you can also reach out to external groups like the ND Lawyer Project or join peer support spaces online.
Look on your firm’s intranet for:
These documents usually outline who to speak to, how to raise concerns informally and what the formal process looks like if you choose to escalate later. It helps to know your options, even if you don’t plan to use them right now.
Before anything formal, you can raise concerns informally with:
You could say something like:
“I’ve been finding X quite difficult and wanted to talk it through before deciding what to do next.”
This keeps it non-confrontational but puts it on their radar.
Start a private log. Include:
This is not about preparing for court. It’s about having your own clarity and evidence if you ever need to escalate things later.
ACAS is a government-supported service that offers advice on workplace problems. They’re impartial and can help you:
You can call their helpline or use the website chat. It’s free and you don’t need to take action just because you’ve asked a question.
This could be:
You don’t have to figure it all out alone. A fresh perspective can help you see things more clearly.
If your workplace pushes back on the word “adjustments,” you can reframe it as a “working style preference” or a “productivity support”.
For example:
“I find I concentrate much better if I use headphones for part of the day. Would it be okay to keep doing that?”
“Would it be possible to use written instructions rather than verbal ones where it makes sense to do so?”
This isn’t ideal, but it can be more effective in environments where legal terms make people defensive.
If informal routes haven’t helped and you want to flag something without going legal, you can submit a formal grievance. This is different from making a legal claim. A grievance is an internal process where you explain the problem and ask for it to be investigated.
You’ll usually need to:
This can feel heavy, so it helps to get support before deciding to go down this route.
Sometimes survival means choosing peace over principle. Other times it means picking one issue to advocate for. Either way, you’re doing your best inside a system that was not built for you.
Trying to challenge everything that feels unfair will wear you down. Speak up when it matters, especially when your progression, wellbeing or job security are at risk. You can’t fix the whole system. Focus on protecting your peace and energy.
Keep a private log of what’s been said, what you’ve asked for and how you’ve been treated. This isn’t just for legal reasons. It helps you spot patterns, track progress and validate your own experience if things feel confusing or inconsistent.
Find one person you can check in with. That might be a mentor, a trusted colleague or someone from a staff network. Even a quiet message like “I’m finding things difficult, could I check something with you?” can make a big difference.
You might not be able to change your manager or how the organisation works. But you can still set boundaries, build in breaks, and create small workarounds that suit your brain. These might not solve everything, but they can soften the edges.
Some days, success is not quitting. It’s protecting your mental health, finishing one task or saying no to something that would have pushed you over the edge. You don’t need to thrive every day to be doing well.
None of this is your fault. We need better systems, better managers and real accountability. But if you’re staying, because you need the income, the structure or you care about the work, this is what survival can look like. This isn’t about masking. It’s about making it through in one piece.
Ensure your adjustments are in place from day one.
Firms often have some flexibility around how training is delivered. Examples of adjustments that may help include:
Almost every trainee, neurotypical or otherwise, feels this way at some point. It’s normal not to know everything. You’re learning, and even when things feel overwhelming, that doesn’t mean you’re failing.
Remind yourself:
You won’t always control your time.
At first, it might feel like your time is no longer your own, especially if you’re in a high-pressure seat. Some firms expect you to be available long hours and put work above everything else. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t set boundaries.
Things that may help:
Seat changes can feel destabilising, just as you’ve got used to a team and your adjustments are working, everything resets.
To make transitions smoother:
Appraisal meetings (e.g. mid-seat or end-of-seat reviews) can feel stressful, especially if you’re unsure how feedback will be delivered or interpreted.
You can ask for adjustments here too:
It’s okay to advocate for a feedback style that works for you, this improves both how you receive the information and how you act on it.
Instruction meetings can be overwhelming, especially if your processing style doesn’t fit the ‘quick chat and go’ format. You’re expected to absorb information quickly, understand legal and commercial context, figure out what’s being asked (often from someone senior), and get started without much direction. For many neurodivergent trainees, that’s not realistic.
You’re not alone if you leave these meetings thinking, “I don’t actually know what they want.”
If you struggle with processing or structuring information, the following adjustments might be useful (and are all reasonable to ask for):
Before or during the meeting:
After the meeting:
This is a practical method we’ve used and shared at NDLP. It helps bring clarity to complex or ambiguous instructions. After the meeting, use this to structure your notes or follow-up email.
You can use these as a checklist or even structure your follow-up message like this:
“Hi [name], just to confirm my understanding of the [X] task:
– What: draft a short note summarising X issue under Y regulation.
– Why: to support a response to the client’s query before their board meeting.
– Who: intended for the client’s in-house counsel team.
– When: ideally by 3pm tomorrow to allow time for partner review.
– Where: I’ll upload to the shared folder and notify you.
– How: written in bullet point format with references to FCA guidance.
Please let me know if I’ve misunderstood anything.”
Each firm handles this process slightly differently. Some are open about roles early on. Others leave you in the dark until offers are announced. The one consistent theme? It rarely feels transparent or accessible.
What to expect:
1. You will be asked to state your preferences
This might be a formal ranking form or just a vague chat with HR. You do not need to have it all figured out, but it helps to be clear on what matters to you. Think about what teams you’ve enjoyed, what kind of hours you can manage, and whether you’d consider moving teams or offices.
2. The business will decide what teams are hiring
Availability of NQ roles is often based on budgets and forecasts. Even if a team says they would love to keep you, they may have no headcount. Some teams will “hold out” for a lateral hire with more experience.
3. You may need to re-interview or submit something
Some firms make you reapply or write a business case. Others will have informal coffee chats. If interviews or assessments are involved, it is completely reasonable to request adjustments. Ask early and be clear about what you need.
4. You might not get your first choice or any offer at all
This happens more often than people think. It does not mean you were not good enough. Sometimes the space just is not there. Sometimes a partner has already decided. Sometimes it comes down to who got exposure to the right people at the right time.
This part of the process can be especially difficult if you are not comfortable with “visibility politics”.
Let’s be honest. A lot of trainees feel like they have to “arse lick” their way into an NQ role. You see people being strategic. Pushing for certain work. Making sure the right people know their name. That may come naturally to some, but if you are neurodivergent, it might feel awkward, draining, or completely inaccessible.
Maybe you do not know how to start small talk with a partner. Maybe you mask so heavily that networking leaves you exhausted. Maybe you are just not that good at putting yourself forward or “talking yourself up”. That is not a character flaw. It is a barrier.
If you are struggling with this, you are not alone. It is hard to advocate for yourself in a process that feels unclear and loaded with bias.
A few things that can help, if you feel able:
Some helpful adjustments to ask for include:
If you are asking for adjustments, try to ask as early as possible and follow up in writing. You do not need to disclose your diagnosis, but explaining how your needs affect you in this context can help the firm understand.
It is hard. Even if you knew it was coming, it still hurts. You spend two years working hard, sometimes under difficult conditions, and it can feel incredibly unfair to walk away without a role. Sometimes the reasons are structural. Sometimes they are personal. Sometimes no one will tell you the real reason.
This does not mean you are not good at your job. You are still going to qualify, and you are still going to build a legal career that works for you.
Check out our Job Hunting Corner for guidance on CVs, interviews, cover letters, applications and more, including tips on disclosing neurodivergence and asking for adjustments during external processes.
You are not alone in this part of the process either.
Disclaimer: This will not apply to everyone. This is not designed to be exhaustive.
Confidence is not always about mindset. Sometimes it’s about access, clarity and the right kind of support. Advice may differ depending upon your specific circumstances, but here is a few tips.
You do not need to change who you are to feel confident. Sometimes confidence comes from being given the space to do things differently.
If things still feel heavy, these spaces may help:
This isn’t about intelligence. It’s about how your brain takes in and organises information. There are practical ways to manage this.
You are not slower or less capable. You just process differently. Giving yourself time and using the right tools can make a huge difference to how you work and how confident you feel.
Organisation is not just about self-discipline. It’s often about finding a structure that works for your brain.
Communication in law is full of unspoken rules. Whether it’s reading between the lines in emails, knowing when to speak in meetings or figuring out what’s “too much” or “too blunt,” it can be exhausting. Add in networking events or office chat, and it’s easy to feel like you’re getting it wrong just by showing up as yourself.
The information on this page is for general guidance only and is not legal advice. While we aim to provide practical and accurate content based on lived experience and research, it may not apply to your specific situation.
If you are facing a legal issue or require advice on your rights, you should speak to a qualified legal professional or adviser. We are not able to provide legal representation or act on your behalf in any dispute.